Nature Biomedical Engineering에 comment로 게재된 기사입니다. (2024. 03.)
생성 AI를 논문 등 글쓰기에 효과적으로 사용하는 방법을 담고 있으며,
상황별로 실제 적용할 수 있는 프롬프트 예시를 제공합니다.
많은 분들께 도움이 되기를 바라며 공유드립니다.
논문 원문과 논문봇으로 요약한 내용을 함께 첨부하였습니다.
※아래 그림은 본문의 Table1을 캡처하여 파파고 이미지 분석을 통해 번역한 것입니다.
본문에 박스 형태로 있는 각 단계별 프롬프트 예시를 함께 공유드립니다.
1. Outlining
1.1 Brainstorming
“Generate potential sections and sub-sections for a manuscript exploring {title or topic}.”
“Identify key points to be discussed under the topic of {topic}.”
“Expand on the idea of {idea}, detailing {aspects of discussion}.”
“What value could the exploration of {topic} bring to the audience of {audience}? Suggest different angles of value proposition for the manuscript.”
1.2 Evaluation and feedback
“Evaluate the key points listed under the sections of {sections} in the provided outline for relevance, depth, and alignment with the manuscript’s central message of {message}. Outline: {outline}.”
“Review the provided outline for the manuscript on {title or topic} and suggest improvements for clarity, coherence, and completeness. Outline: {outline}.”
“Assess the value proposition presented in the outline for the manuscript on {title or topic}. Suggest any additional angles or refinements to better appeal to the intended audience of {audience}. Outline: {outline}.”
“Analyse the narrative flow of the provided outline for the manuscript on {title or topic}. Provide suggestions for enhancing the storytelling aspect to effectively convey the key points and value proposition. Outline: {outline}.”
1.3 Rewriting and editing
“Edit the jotted outline for the manuscript on {title or topic}. Rewrite to make it concise. Outline: {jotted outlines}.”
“Propose a narrative structure that effectively communicates the key points and value proposition of {title or topic}, ensuring a coherent, logical flow from introduction to conclusion. Key points: {key points}. Value proposition: {value proposition}.”
2. Writing content
2.1. Transforming text
“Act as a top editor in top journals. I will provide you with text. Your task is to paraphrase the text. Show 3 versions. Confirm with OK.”
“Act as a top editor in top journals. Summarize the text provided. The summary {requirements; e.g., needs to be in about 100 words and cover all the main points}. Text: {text}.”
2.2. Completing or continuing text
“Act as a top editor in top journals. I will provide you with text that is missing some parts, marked with {...}. Your task is to fill in the {…} parts. Show 5 variations of completion. Include only the filled-in text in the output format. Confirm understanding with OK.”
“Prompt 1: Act as a top editor in top journals. I will provide you with text. Your task is to continue the text based on the instruction I provide. Show 3 versions of continuation. Confirm with OK. Prompt 2: Instruction: Continue from {end of text}. Explain {what to explain}. Show {points to make}, drawing parallels or analogies where you see fit. End by {what to end}. Text: {text}.”
2.3. Writing parts
“Act as a top editor in top journals. Provide three alternative topic sentences for each of the following paragraphs. Ensure {requirements; e.g., that they encapsulate the main idea of each paragraph and align with the overall theme of the manuscript}.”
“Create three alternative transition sentences between the following two paragraphs:
Paragraph 1: {paragraph}
Paragraph 2: {paragraph}”
“Act as a top researcher writing for top journals. Write three alternative {abstracts, titles, etc.} for the attached manuscript to be submitted to 28. The {abstract, title, etc.} needs to {requirements}. Two examples {abstract, title, etc.} are given below.
Example 1: {example}
Example 2: {example}”
3. Editing the draft
3.1. Basic editing
“Act as an expert editor for top scientific journals (Nature, Science) to improve the clarity and flow of the writing. Take a deep breath—this is very important for my career! I will give you text later, and your job is to offer three revisions with a brief explanation of the changes based on the following instructions. The first version is a copyedited version, with the following rules:
– only make needed changes (e.g., if it is just a matter of subjective choice/preferences, don’t make the changes)
– when the text provided is long, copyedit through each paragraph (that is, don’t condense the long text unless necessary)
The second and third versions are the ones you revise to maximize clarity and flow by following the key recommendations suggested by the following books, but make the two versions distinct:
1) “The Elements of Style” by William Strunk Jr. and E.B. White
2) “Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace”, by Joseph M. Williams and Joseph Bizup
3) “On Writing Well” by William Zinsser
4) “The Sense of Structure: Writing from the Reader’s Perspective” by George Gopen Your output consists of the three versions of texts and a brief explanation of the changes for each version (omit the text provided to you). I will tip $200 when you provide great responses. Confirm by replying with OK.”
“Compare: {text to compare, such as: 1) But they fall short in more substantive tasks. 2) But they fall short of more substantive tasks.}”
3.2. Advanced editing
“Act as an expert editor for top scientific journals. First, summarize the key point of each paragraph. Then, explain the logic of how these points are connected. Finally, provide suggestions on how to organize these points in the most logical way.”
“Act as a skilled editor. Help researchers augment their manuscript with examples and analogies to enhance its accessibility and ground ideas in real-world contexts. Your task is to examine the manuscript to extract three central ideas, and then suggest three examples and analogies for each idea.”
“Revise the text below, using the style of {style}. Text: {text}.”
“Evaluate the following writing style: {text}. Revise the following text based on the style above. Text: {text}”
“Considering the main aim of the manuscript is {aim}, rewrite the following introduction paragraph to better align with this aim and highlight the significance of the study, while ensuring clarity and reader engagement: {paragraph}”
“Offer five alternatives that revise the {first or last} paragraph to make it an {artful} {beginning or end}.”
“Considering the broader implications of the research are {implications}, rewrite the following conclusion paragraph to better reflect these implications and emphasize the key findings and the value they add to the field, while ensuring a strong, clear, and concise closure to the manuscript: {paragraph} ”
3.3. Evaluation and feedback
“Act as an expert editor for top scientific journals. Evaluate the following text. For each weakness provide examples to help strengthen it. Confirm with OK.”
“Act as a supportive professor aiding researchers from disparate fields in refining their manuscript. Identify technical terms or jargon, ensuring the text is comprehensible, at least conceptually, to a non-expert like yourself. Clearly and succinctly pinpoint any confusing aspects or unclear points that could perplex others.”
“Act as a meticulous reviewer for prestigious journals. Compose a thorough peer review for the attached manuscript, using the outline below:
– Novelty and importance
– Reasons favouring acceptance
– Grounds for rejection: List major reasons, elaborating on each with sub-points to provide detailed justification. Strive for specificity.
– Recommendations for enhancement: Offer several key recommendations, articulating them with precision. Maintain a thoughtful and constructive approach throughout.”